Topic: AI

  • Win More Projects With AI-Moderated Qual – And Get Paid For It

    Win More Projects With AI-Moderated Qual – And Get Paid For It

    This is a Lunch&Learn session with Tellet In this session, Greg Burke from Tellet will show you exactly how AI-moderated qualitative research works in practice – from designing a discussion guide to analysing hundreds of in-depth conversations at once. You’ll see a live demo of the Tellet platform, hear how independent researchers and agencies are already using it to win new business, and learn how you can start including it in your own proposals. He’ll also walk through our new referral scheme for ICG members.

    About Tellet 

    Tellet is an AI-moderated qualitative research platform used by agencies, consultancies, and independent researchers worldwide. It lets you run hundreds of in-depth, conversational interviews simultaneously – giving you qualitative depth at quantitative scale, without needing a large team. For independents and small firms, that means you can take on bigger briefs, deliver faster, and offer something genuinely differentiated.

    Greg Burke

    Greg Burke is the CEO and co-founder of Tellet. Based in Amsterdam, he has spent the last three years building Tellet into a platform used by some of the world’s leading research agencies and brands, including Kantar, NielsenIQ, Vodafone, and KPMG. Greg is passionate about giving independent researchers access to the same tools the big agencies use.

    The referral scheme

    Tellet are introducing a referral arrangement for ICG members, valid throughout 2026. If you introduce a new client to Tellet and they go on to complete a qualifying project (minimum 100 participants), we’ll pay you a referral fee of €500 for the first project. For every subsequent qualifying project that client runs on Tellet during 2026, you’ll earn €250. There’s no ongoing commitment – just a straightforward way to earn from recommending a tool you already know works.

    Register for this session here 

  • ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini? Decide by User Experience

    ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini? Decide by User Experience

    Article by ICG member John Habershon

    John Habershon PhD

    Introduction

    This is the first of three waves of research in this fast moving market, based on 1,264 genuine conversations by informed users on Reddit and X. Although the process is enabled by AI, there is no synthetic data – these are real people exchanging views, based on real experience.

    Timeline

    The online conversations are up-to-date – drawn from the first week of February 2026 for Wave 1.


    Overall Sentiment Ranking

    Article content

    Most suitable for Market Research Professionals

    Article content

    Themes

    10 Primary Themes Tracked:

    USE CASES – 303 mentions (24.0%) Practical applications: Coding, Content creation, API integration; PRICING / ACCESS – 259 mentions (20.5%) Subscription costs (107), Free tier limits (74), API pricing (45); LEARNING / TUTORIALS – 119 mentions (9.4%) How-to guides, community knowledge sharing; API / INTEGRATION – 92 mentions (7.3%) Developer workflows, automation; ISSUES / PROBLEMS; FEATURES; PRIVACY / SAFETY; PERFORMANCE – Speed, quality, accuracy; USER EXPERIENCE Interface, workflow, ease of use; COMPARISON – Tool-to-tool evaluations


    Verbatim Comments

    30 verbatim comments on each theme:

    Provides texture for report

    “There’s a ceiling every serious Claude user hits, and it has nothing to do with prompting skills. If you use Claude regularly for real work, you’ve probably gotten good at it. Detailed system prompts, rich context, maybe projects with carefully curated knowledge files.” Reddit user


    Personas

    Persona 1: The Technical Architect

    Persona 2: The Pragmatic Professional

    Persona 3: The Disappointed Explorer

    Persona 4: The Cost-Conscious Switcher

    Persona 5: The Workflow Optimiser

    Persona 6: The Reddit Community Supporter


    Improvements for each tool

    Implementation Priority Matrix:

    URGENT (0-30 days):

    • X: Emergency quality fixes
    • Y: Pricing strategy revision
    • Z: Pricing communication

    HIGH (30-90 days):

    • X: Privacy + features
    • Y: Differentiation + quality
    • Z: Learning curve reduction

    MEDIUM (90-180 days):

    • All tools: Community improvements
    • All tools: Platform-specific strategies

    Subscribe and gain access to a full report and spreadsheet. You will receive two further waves to track developments and improvements in each tool in this fast developing market.

    johnhabershon@icloud.com

  • RECORDING: The Researcher’s Toolkit: Working Smarter with Gamma AI

    RECORDING: The Researcher’s Toolkit: Working Smarter with Gamma AI

    This Knowledge Share has been sponsored by Indeemo.

     

     

    Most people have heard about Canva but have you used Gamma yet? If not, Andrew will show you how to create research stimulus, redesign existing reports, create newsletters, webpages, social media visuals and, when you don’t have any content, even create reports from scratch!

    This can all be done within Gamma. It’s easy, really quick and you will be surprised how good it looks!

    By the end of the session, you will have a good idea of whether Gamma should be in your toolkit.

    Andrew Smith

    With 30 years of research experience, Andrew blends qualitative depth with quantitative precision to uncover the insights that drive smarter decisions, stronger customer relationships and business growth.

    Andrew grew up in the media world, leading centralised insight and data teams and in 2012, he founded Insight Advantage to support both B2C & B2B businesses. Andrew is a joint author, with business owners from a diverse range of sectors, of a book entitled: “Success Secrets For Business Growth.”

    In 2025, Andrew founded Padel Insights Network (PIN) bringing together players from across the market research, data and marketing sectors to play padel, network and have fun. To date, events have been held in London, Manchester and Leeds with more sessions planned throughout 2026.

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/speak2andrew/

    https://insightadvantage.co.uk/

    https://www.linkedin.com/company/padel-insights-network-pin/

    Watch this session here 

  • Using AI for Discussion Guides

    Using AI for Discussion Guides

    This Knowledge Share will be presented by ICG member Jay Zaltzman and is sponsored by Indeemo. A lot has been said about using AI for qualitative analysis and report-writing, but what about using AI to prepare for qualitative research? In this Knowledge Share, Jay Zaltzman will share how he used ChatGPT to help design the methodology and write a discussion guide for a sample research project. You may have heard the expression that the first focus group is “like the first pancake” – it rarely comes out quite right and you frequently end up tweaking the discussion guide afterward. AI may be able to help figure out in advance which questions might “fall flat” and how to rewrite them. Jay Zaltzman Jay Zaltzman is based in Palm Springs, California, USA. He is a frequent presenter at research conferences and a past president of the QRCA. He writes an email newsletter called Research Tidbits – short, digestible tidbits about the world of marketing and market research, available here: https://bureauwest.com/subscribe . And more information about Jay is available here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jayzaltzman/

    Register for this session here 

  • Dr StrangeQual, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love AI Analysis

    Dr StrangeQual, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love AI Analysis

    By ICG member Arthur Fletcher

     

    For years I loved interviewing people and quietly dreaded everything that came afterwards. AI didn’t replace my craft – it gave it back to me.

    Most qualitative researchers I know love the same part of the job:

    • The interviews
    • The focus groups
    • The moments when someone says something that genuinely matters.

    I believe there’s an intimacy in good qualitative work that isn’t always acknowledged.  It’s a temporary contract between two people: one asking thoughtful questions, the other being given permission to share what they really think and feel.  The best qualitative researchers are great communicators, careful listeners and instinctive analysts.  We ask, listen, notice what’s missing and adapt our questions in real time.

    For me, a qualitative enquiry feels like detective work.  You don’t accept the first answer you’re given – you probe, circle back, test assumptions – following threads until something deeper reveals itself.   When a session ends well, you have a quiet sense of achievement:

    I did my job properly. I learned something useful, something insightful that will help my client understand their customers more clearly.

    And then comes the part I dread – the analysis.

    Re-watching recordings can feel like reliving your life, only slower. Transcripts are unforgiving – slabs of text stripped of tone and warmth. Making notes is laborious. Cutting, tagging and condensing hours of rich personal conversation into something coherent and insightful is hard work, and not always the good kind:

    • What should I keep?
    • What should I leave out?
    • How do I decide, with deadlines looming and energy fading?

    The irony is that this is exactly when we should be at our best. But the pressure doesn’t help interpretation and the grind doesn’t encourage curiosity. If I’m honest, there were times when the sheer weight of analysis dulled the joy I felt during fieldwork. If it weren’t for the analysis, I’d happily interview all day long.

    But then comes the presentation, the part we all look forward to.

    This is where everything comes together – where great questions and response driven probing turn into insights.  This is where clients see something they hadn’t fully understood before, the knowing nods of appreciation feel earned.  I have to admit there’s a sort of performative pleasure to it, even a little preening. We bask briefly in our feathered glory… before returning to our desks and the next round of transcripts.

    This is where AI changed everything for me:

    • Not as a shortcut
    • Not as a replacement
    • But as a partner

    I now analyse my qualitative work with AI beside me – tireless and attentive with a perfect memory of every word spoken in every session.  I can start at a high level, understand the overall landscape, and then choose where to go deeper. I can follow themes, test interpretations, explore contradictions and revisit ideas with fresh eyes.

    This is where the detective in me solves the crime – method, motive and opportunity.

    Working with my little AI friend feels less like trawling through material and more like continuing the conversation.  It’s an opportunity to question my respondents again, this time where I can see the whole picture at once.

    Crucially, AI gives me back the time I lost in lengthy and sometimes laborious video/transcript reviewing.  It gives me the time to think and reflect on the responses and do the parts of the job that made me fall in love with qualitative research in the first place – sense-making, interpretation and recommendation.

    My analysis is more comprehensive because nothing is forgotten and my thinking is sharper because I’m not exhausted by the mechanics.  I feel more like a researcher again and less like a data janitor.

    So no, AI doesn’t make qualitative research colder or more mechanical for me, it liberates me to produce work which is more comprehensive, more insightful and more valuable to my clients.

    It also did something far more surprising.

    It helped me stop worrying and start loving analysis again!

     

    (1) Arthur Fletcher | LinkedIn

    Arthur Fletcher, Author at The ICG

  • RECORDING: AI Beyond Chatbots and Prompts

    RECORDING: AI Beyond Chatbots and Prompts

    This session was generously sponsored by Indeemo

     

     

    This intermediate session is for researchers who want to move beyond basic prompting and explore the less visible capabilities of AI. We’ll look at different types of AI, what they can do, and how to use them to streamline and elevate your research practice. You’ll learn how to build your own queryable knowledge bases, analyse complex qual and quant data more efficiently, and introduce AI-driven workflows that save time on routine tasks. If you’re curious about AI capabilities and want practical, non-technical guidance, this session is for you.

    Nadia Antropova

    Nadia Antropova is an insights and strategy consultant working with CPG brands, retailers, and agencies on mixed-method studies. She helps consumer brands build data-driven brand, channel, category, and portfolio strategies that support commercial growth. She also supports insights leaders in navigating the technology landscape, drawing on her experience in advanced analytics, global SaaS rollouts, and machine learning initiatives.

    Watch this session here 

  • QualMinds and the rise of Ai moderation – part 2

    QualMinds and the rise of Ai moderation – part 2

    By ICG member Hugh Carling

    Hot (ish) on the heels of the ICG’s fascinating panel on AI,  QualMinds was launched.

    Expert views on hot topics

    QualMinds is a small panel of expert independent researchers who each month will be sharing their views on a topical question about the developments shaping qualitative research, particularly around AI. It features:

    We’re using Liveminds Now to capture, curate and share the experts’ views in a short video report each month.

    AI tool wish list

    In the future, what AI powered research product or feature would you most like to see developed and why? We asked our QualMinds panel of ICG members, and they shared a fascinating wish list (sadly not available in time for Christmas…)

    Their ideas include:

    – AI with “bionic memory” for deeper analysis
    – Culturally aware AI
    – Tools for better visual storytelling
    – Holistic innovation platforms
    – Truth telling in participant screening

    You can hear highlights of their ideas in full in this video.

     

    (Earlier video: How do you feel about the rise of AI-mediated moderation? here)

     

  • The Symphony within the Data – Composing Insights with AI

    The Symphony within the Data – Composing Insights with AI

    Article by ICG member Arthur Fletcher

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Using Collaborative AI* to produce a research report is, in many ways, like composing a beautiful symphony.

    It begins with the interviews themselves: the raw conversations, the stories, the hesitations, the sparks of emotion. These are your musical materials – keys, chords, motifs, riffs and phrases.  Each participant offers a new timbre, a different rhythm, a subtle variation on the theme.  By the time fieldwork ends, you have an orchestra’s worth of material waiting to be shaped.

    For a typical AI analysis, the next step is an analysis plan: an executive summary, a thematic breakdown, key quotes, implications etc.  This is immensely valuable but it can feel like a pianola roll – a predetermined script that produces a pleasant, recognisable tune.  It follows familiar combinations and harmonic progressions and it gets the job done but it is not yet a symphony. It has form, but not soul.

    This is where Collaborative AI changes the creative atmosphere.

    The AI takes that pianola roll – the structure, the patterns, the first implications – and lays it out clearly.  Then, like a composer settling at the piano, you begin to explore. You start asking questions of your data:

    “What happens if I follow this theme?”

    “Where does this emotional progression lead?”

    “What is the story hiding beneath this discord?”

    The AI listens, responds and plays back possibilities.  It doesn’t invent notes that were never played, it helps you uncover the melodies the data is already singing.  It can isolate a phrase from one interview, harmonise it with a counter-theme from another or spotlight a discord that demands resolution.  It allows you to roam through your material with freedom, curiosity and confidence, guided but never constrained.

    Slowly, the music becomes richer.  Insights that were once scattered become aligned. Subtle tensions resolve into understanding.  A fleeting remark becomes the emotional centrepiece of the movement.  What began as raw notes and mechanical playback transforms into something shaped by instinct, interpretation and craft.

    And then – almost imperceptibly – the final composition emerges.

    Not a machine-generated tune, not a formulaic analysis but a symphony – layered, resonant, human in its sensitivity and unmistakably yours.

    Collaborative AI does not replace the researcher, it accompanies them.  It provides the structure of the composition, the clarity of the score and the responsiveness of an intuitive musical partner.  But the symphony – the insight, the narrative arc, the emotional truth – is composed by the human hand.

    In this way, Collaborative AI doesn’t diminish the artistry of qualitative research.  It amplifies it, offering researchers the chance to move beyond mechanical summaries and into the realm of genuine creative interpretation.

    Because when AI and researcher compose together, insight can finally sound as beautiful, as powerful, and as unforgettable as music.

    If you would like to know more about Collaborative AI*, please get in touch.

    *’Collaborative AI’ is a term I’ve coined to describe an AI that works with the researcher rather than in their place – an intelligence that supports, clarifies and elevates human interpretation while remaining absolutely faithful to the data.

    AI also helped me to create this article.

    Arthur Fletcher | LinkedIn

  • RECORDING: The Perfect AI Partner to Supercharge Your Research Projects

    RECORDING: The Perfect AI Partner to Supercharge Your Research Projects

    We welcome Motives.ai to this 30-min Lunch&Learn session.

     

     

    Motives.ai brings the consumer to life through AI-moderated, video interviews – It is a project gamechanger in terms of speed, depth, breadth, value and client engagement, by optimizing flexibility in terms of regionality, timelines, sample size, analysis and insight on a video-based platform

    In the session, the Motives team will talk you through the Motives.ai platform discuss the benefits, run through a live demo and field any questions.

    More specifically….

    Motives is the new way for brands to get in-depth consumer insight.

    Powered by an AI qualitative researcher, you can use Motives to run entire qualitative projects or as a super-smart AI partner on the project. It can help you make projects faster, more scaleable and more affordable than traditional methods. Motives is there as your research partner for the entire research process, from brief generation and discussion guide development through to recruitment, fieldwork and in-depth, respondent-led analysis. Our expert AI works as your research partner – super fast, insightful and getting everything you need before your next meeting.

    Our speakers

    Sean Conley – Motives.ai founder and CEO

     

     

     

    Founder & CEO – after spending years building and scaling AI products, and leading teams at Google, Dataiku, and Truelayer, Sean launched Motives.  The Motives vision is to bring human researchers and the latest AI models together to deliver excellent qualitative insights.

    John Jones

     

     

     

    An insight specialist of over 30 years, working agency-side for Added Value Company (now Kantar), Informer Interactive Research, the Blinc Partneship and Firefish, client-side at the BBC, Levi Strauss Europe and ITV, plus creative strategy roles at St Lukes, Red Bee Media and Sky Creative. For the last 8 years, I have been running Fabric Insight and consulting for Motives. John is also an ICG member.

    https://www.motives.ai/

    Special deal for ICG members:

    Our normal price for brands is £200/completed interview, but we’re offering ICG members a 20% discount: £160/completed interview. That also covers the recruiting and there aren’t any additional fees to use the platform.

    Watch this session here 

     

    Contact: Sean Conley 

  • The Launch of QualMinds and the Rise of AI Moderation

    The Launch of QualMinds and the Rise of AI Moderation

    By ICG member Hugh Carling

    Hot (ish) on the heels of this year’s ICG fascinating panel on AI, we’re very happy to announce the launch of QualMinds. 

    Expert views on hot topics

    QualMinds is a small panel of expert independent researchers who each month will be sharing their views on a topical question about the developments shaping qualitative research, particularly around AI. It features:

    We’re using Liveminds Now to capture, curate and share the experts’ views in a short video report each month. 

    The rise of AI moderation

    It’s been hard to miss the rapid rise of AI-mediated moderation this year. So we asked our group of AI enthusiasts:

    How do you feel about the rise of AI-mediated moderation? 

    Watch here 

    A few themes came through strongly in the responses:

    • AI moderation is undeniably quick and affordable and could work well in structured, lower-stakes conversations.
    • However, automation will sacrifice emotional nuance, cultural understanding and the subtleties that make human moderation so valuable.
    • Most agreed the future is likely to be hybrid, using AI for when efficiency and scale is essential and humans for depth.

    You can watch the video highlights and see the views of other independent researchers here on LinkedIn. 

    Next month, we’ll be exploring another timely question. If you have a topic you’d like the QualMinds to tackle, please do get in touch.